A recent Brazilian court ruling provides another setback for Apple, no matter how small it is compared to hundreds of billions of dollars in safes. Another loss Apple lost in the South American country after the 2020 defeat was having to bundle the Road Stone with phones sold in the state of São Paulo. Apple has been fined $1.9 million by the Consumer Protection Agency for the second year in a row for failing to provide chargers for its iPhone 12 and iPhone 13 series phones. Apple showed no intention of changing course for the whole country, let alone the global market. But the latest ruling sets a precedent for more iPhone buyers to roll the ball if they decide to take Apple to court.
Also of crucial importance is the reasoning provided by the courts in Apple’s recent lawsuit. The court order (machine translation from Portuguese to English) is “The adapter is an essential part for the effective operation of the purchased item..” Citing Apple’s policy “violent‘ The court also criticized defense counsel that Apple continues to make chargers and sell them separately, but removing the chargers would curb negative environmental impacts. The latter logic was expressed not only by Brazil, but also by experts in Asian and European Union countries.
Apple is said to have saved billions of dollars by removing chargers from iPhone retail boxes. However, the company is reaping more profits by selling the wired and wireless MagSafe charger separately rather than delivering a tangible benefit to its customers. It is noteworthy whether the recent Brazilian court’s ruling will have repercussions beyond borders and countries. apologize On more matters on consumer rights.
Source: Bloomberg
More information
What Apple’s iPhone Charger Lawsuit Defeat Means For Everyone Else
The latest court ruling in Brazil is another setback for Apple, irrespective of how infinitesimally small the amount is compared to the hundreds of billions in its coffers. It is yet another loss for Apple in the South American country, following a 2020 defeat that forced the company to bundle a charging brick with phones sold in the state of Sao Paolo. For two years in a row, Apple was fined a sum of $1.9 million for not providing a charger for the iPhone 12 and iPhone 13 series phones by the country’s consumer protection regulator. Apple has shown no intention of making a course correction for the entire nation, let alone its global market. However, the latest ruling sets a precedent that could get the ball rolling if more iPhone buyers decide to take Apple to court.
The reason cited by the court in Apple’s latest legal tussle is also of critical importance. The court order (machine translated from Portuguese to English) clearly states that “the adapter is an essential item for effective operation of the purchased object.” Citing Apple’s policy as “abusive,” the court also lambasted the defense that removing the charger was to curb the negative impact on the environment, despite Apple continuing to make chargers and selling them separately. The latter reasoning has been voiced by experts not just in Brazil, but across Asia and EU nations as well.
Apple is said to have saved billions by removing the charger from iPhones’ retail box, but rather than passing on the benefits to customers in a tangible way, the company is raking in more profits by hawking wired as well as wireless MagSafe chargers separately. It remains to be seen whether the latest court ruling from Brazil sends ripples across international borders and lands Apple into more consumer rights trouble.
Source: Bloomberg
#Apples #iPhone #Charger #Lawsuit #Defeat #Means
What Apple’s iPhone Charger Lawsuit Defeat Means For Everyone Else
The latest court ruling in Brazil is another setback for Apple, irrespective of how infinitesimally small the amount is compared to the hundreds of billions in its coffers. It is yet another loss for Apple in the South American country, following a 2020 defeat that forced the company to bundle a charging brick with phones sold in the state of Sao Paolo. For two years in a row, Apple was fined a sum of $1.9 million for not providing a charger for the iPhone 12 and iPhone 13 series phones by the country’s consumer protection regulator. Apple has shown no intention of making a course correction for the entire nation, let alone its global market. However, the latest ruling sets a precedent that could get the ball rolling if more iPhone buyers decide to take Apple to court.
The reason cited by the court in Apple’s latest legal tussle is also of critical importance. The court order (machine translated from Portuguese to English) clearly states that “the adapter is an essential item for effective operation of the purchased object.” Citing Apple’s policy as “abusive,” the court also lambasted the defense that removing the charger was to curb the negative impact on the environment, despite Apple continuing to make chargers and selling them separately. The latter reasoning has been voiced by experts not just in Brazil, but across Asia and EU nations as well.
Apple is said to have saved billions by removing the charger from iPhones’ retail box, but rather than passing on the benefits to customers in a tangible way, the company is raking in more profits by hawking wired as well as wireless MagSafe chargers separately. It remains to be seen whether the latest court ruling from Brazil sends ripples across international borders and lands Apple into more consumer rights trouble.
Source: Bloomberg
#Apples #iPhone #Charger #Lawsuit #Defeat #Means
Synthetic: Vik News
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/001-b128e9ce6d374bd8845eddb09ff696c1.jpg)
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/A3-SearchFiltersOnInstagram-annotated-e34ced8cde7c4310bd43276b07653a37.jpg)
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/EVGoFastChargingStations_EVGo-85910b85b9104415847fc0f9acdf7872.jpg)